|
Andrea Cincotta

On August 21, 1998 at the end of his workday, Chris Johnson
returned to his condo where he and he fiancé, Andrea Cincotta lived
in Arlington, Virginia. He thought it a bit odd she was not at home
when he arrived, but he waited patiently assuming she would show up
within a short period of time to go out to the movies for the evening
or stay in and watch a video. The evening passed, however, and Andrea
did not come home. He eventually called an area hospital but Andrea
had not been in accident and had not shown up in the emergency room.
He did his laundry, watched a little television and eventually lied
down on the bed and dozed off. He awoke at one thirty in the morning
and still Andrea had not come home. He gazed across the room in the
dark and noticed her closet door was closed. He walked over and opened
it and found the body of Andrea curled up on the floor, cold and long
dead.
Over two years have passed since that dreadful night. The police heavily
interrogated Andrea's fiancé in the days following the crime. He cooperated
fully with them. They told him they believed he had come home from work,
gotten into an argument with his fiancé and accidentally killed her.
They pressured him until they got a confession. This would not be the
first time that then Detective Bob Carrig had gotten a confession from
an innocent man. David Vasquez was released after a long stay in a Virginia
prison for the 1984 Arlington rape and murder of Carolyn Hamm, later
believed to be one of a set of serial murders committed by serial killer,
Timothy Spencer. Carrig elicited a false confession from Vasquez. Carrig's
methods of interrogation are, at best, questionable. It seems that he
has a habit of giving a suspect false details of the crime, and then
pressuring the suspect to agree.
The story that Chris Johnson finally agreed to might have made sense
except for a number of conflicting points. First, the confession only
included knocking her off balance and her strinking her head during
an argument. This is what they told him happened. He never "confessed"
to strangling Andrea, yet this was the cause of death found according
to both her death certificate and public statements by the police. In
addition, Andrea Cincotta was supposed to meet a friend for lunch. She
never showed up. In addition, she did not answer numerous phone calls
to her residence that afternoon. In fact, nobody is known to have seen
her alive after lunchtime. The Arlington Police Department and the Medical
Examiner's office have refused to tell the family the time of death
and have refused to allow the family the right to see the autopsy report
even after Andrea's son, Kevin Cincotta, went to court over the matter.
If Johnson really hit his fiancé by accident when he returned from work
that evening, why did Andrea not show up for her luncheon appointment
with her friend even though she had confirmed it that very morning?
Is the reason the police have refused to share the time of death with
the family possibly connected to the fact Johnson has an ironclad alibi
for the entire workday? Is this why he has never been contacted by the
police since the week of the homicide? Or is it because the police are
covering up something much more serious: that their lack of an investigation
may have led to the rape and attempted murder of a 13-year-old girl
a year later.
The story has other odd notes. Several items were removed from the
condo. To our knowledge, they have never been recovered. Did Andrea's
fiancé purposely take the items to "falsify a burglary," without doing
other, more basic things that would create that impression, such as
jimmying the lock on the front door and ransacking the condo?
The police also seemed to theorize that Johnson had accidentally killed
his fiancé in an argument. However, she was later found in the autopsy
to have been strangled. Are the police having us believe that after
he hit his fiancé by accident, he then cold-bloodedly just finished
her off? For a man with no previous history of domestic violence or
violence of any kind and no known motive for the murder, the story is
a bit strange. Could this be why over fourteen months have passed and
the police have made no arrest? They have indicated to the family that
they are still focusing on him as the only suspect in the case and have
told me in my phone calls to the department that this is an "unusual
case", yet no arrest has been made. The family wants to know: why are
no other suspects are being considered? Is this really a death from
a domestic dispute or is this actually a burglary-related homicide that
has never been investigated as such? If Andrea Cincotta's fiancé was
really involved with her death, why is the department stalling on the
arrest? Are they struggling to make conflicting facts fit the story?
Are they wasting time overfocusing on the fiancé rather than following
other leads in the death of Andrea Cincotta?
Although the police have not made the facts of this case public, what
is known of the crime scene leads this profiler to theorize the homicide
was an interrupted burglary. Andrea Cincotta had plans for her day off
including a luncheon appointment with a good friend. Andrea was not
the type to break her dates and not show up without a phone call. Yet
she never appeared and no one had heard anything from her since that
morning. As she sometimes left the front door unlocked, it is likely
someone entered the apartment believing no one was at home, came in
and surprised Andrea The perpetrator may have hit her and when she fell
to the floor, strangled her to prevent identification either because
she would recognize him or he was on probation. Upon killing her, the
perpetrator may have grabbed what was in sight and took off. The perpetrator
of this kind of crime is a relatively disorganized criminal. The planning
of the crime was minimal and the attack was for self-preservation (prevention
of identification). This offender would have a transient work history,
a possible criminal record of burglary and/or drug arrests and no more
than a high school education, if that much. He would live in a relatively
low income housing area. He would rely on public transport or walking.
If he owns a vehicle, it will be an old vehicle, not well kept up. It
may have dead tags. He would be unable to drive a manual transmission
vehicle properly. The perpetrator of this crime would either live within
the Arlington area or have done work near or on the condo grounds. It
is also possible that he was visiting the Arlington courthouse down
the road. Since the condo is somewhat off the road with other more accessible
condos nearer to the road and the condo was on the second floor, the
killer may have been to the condo for some reason in the recent past
and had some previous contact with the victim. He would most likely
be African-American as the stolen vehicle was found near Barry Farms
in SE DC and the perpetrator of this crime would most likely returned
quickly to his comfort zone. His age would likely be between 25 years
and thirty-five years old.
The Cincotta family would like the Arlington Police to come forward
and make their stand on this case clear. They would like to know if
the time of death exonerates Johnson or not. They would like to know
if they have made a wholehearted investigative effort into the other
possible suspects in this case. They would simply like to know the truth.
UPDATE! SUSPECT IDENTIFIED! (click here)
|
|
|